Modiwl QXE-4029:
Gender + Devotion PreModLit
Gender and Devotion in Pre-Modern Literature 2024-25
QXE-4029
2024-25
School of Arts, Culture And Language
Module - Semester 2
20 credits
Module Organiser:
Sue Niebrzydowski
Overview
What kinds of devotion did pre-modern women experience and write about? How did they express their devotion? This module explores a wide selection of published and manuscript texts that demonstrate the continuities and dissimilarities of late medieval and early modern women鈥檚 religious and secular devotional writing. Graduate students will be introduced to the writing of anchorites, mystics, mothers and lovers, from across the social spectrum, who expressed their devotion in a variety of genres and for widely differing audiences. The material under discussion includes translation, lyric poetry, letters, early autobiographical writing, exegesis, polemic, prophecy and prayer. This module offers opportunities for students to develop and pursue highly innovative lines of research in the analytical comparison of devotional writing from pre- and post-Reformation England.
This module explores a wide selection of published and manuscript texts that demonstrate the breadth, continuities and dissimilarities of late medieval and early modern women鈥檚 devotional writing practices (both religious and secular). Graduate students will be introduced to the writing of anchorites, mystics, mothers and lovers, from across the social spectrum, who expressed their devotion in a variety of genres and for widely differing audiences. The material under discussion emerges in forms as varied as translation, lyric poetry, letters, early autobiographical writing, exegesis, polemic, prophecy and prayer. This module offers opportunities for students to develop and pursue highly innovative lines of research in the analytical comparison of devotional writing from pre- and post-Reformation England.
Assessment Strategy
-threshold -50-59%A Pass (C) candidate鈥檚 work will show many of the following qualities:鈥 satisfactory level of knowledge, analysis and expression.鈥ome familiarity with, and understanding of, relevant theoretical issues.鈥enerally sound organisation of argument, with some critical ability.鈥ccurate expression.鈥ompetent use of quotation and references . -good -60-69%A (B) candidate鈥檚 work reaching Merit will show many of the following qualities:鈥n advanced level of factual knowledge.鈥ignificant [substantial] knowledge of relevant theories and types of analysis.鈥ome evidence of original thought.鈥he ability to organise and argue effectively, make balanced judgements, and demonstrate critical thought.鈥luent and accurate expression.鈥ompetent use of quotation and references.
-excellent -70% and aboveTypically (A), the work of a candidate reaching Distinction will show many of the following qualities:鈥horough knowledge and understanding of relevant theories and types of analysis.鈥horough knowledge of a range of sources and the capacity to engage these critically.鈥ntroduction and discussion of original ideas.鈥elevant, well-organised and sophisticated argument.鈥igh ratio of analysis to exposition.鈥aturity, clarity and cogency of expression.鈥xcellent handling of quotation and references.
Learning Outcomes
- Analyse and discuss the texts and contextual materials examined on the module.
- Analyse the interrelationships of text, context, authorship, audience and textual transmission
- Present a coherent argument in essay form that is evidenced by appropriate primary and secondary material.
- Select and apply appropriate theories of gender, devotion, and literary history to the examination of the texts on the module.
Assessment method
Essay
Assessment type
Summative
Description
4000 word essay
Weighting
70%
Assessment method
Individual Presentation
Assessment type
Summative
Description
A ten-minute presentation in which the student presents the question that they have devised for their summative essay, the texts that will be analysed, articulates the methodology that will be employed, and the secondary material that will support the essay's argument.
Weighting
30%