Module PPC-4005:
Research Methods & Statistics
Research Methods & Statistics 2024-25
PPC-4005
2024-25
School Of Human And Behavioural Sciences
Module - Semester 2
10 credits
Module Organiser:
Susan Clarkson
Overview
Topics covered in this module include: • Research Ethics (Research Proposal) • Quantitative: Designing Research (Research Design) • Quantitative: Data Analysis (Analysing Data) • Quantitative: Descriptive Analysis (Mean, Mode, median) • Quantitative: Inferential Analysis (T-TEST, ANOVA, Correlation) • Qualitative: Designing research (Research Design) • Qualitative: Data Analysis (Grounded Theory, Thematic Analysis, Discourse Analysis, Narrative Inquiry) • Self in the Research (Researcher as Participant) • Planning Research (Research Group Formation) • Planning Research (Research Plans) • Dissertation Planning Please note that these topics are subject to change dependent on staff availability, unexpected circumstances, and the assessed needs of the students.
Topics covered in this module include: • Research Ethics (Research Proposal) • Quantitative: Designing Research (Research Design) • Quantitative: Data Analysis (Analysing Data) • Quantitative: Descriptive Analysis (Mean, Mode, median) • Quantitative: Inferential Analysis (T-TEST, ANOVA, Correlation) • Qualitative: Designing research (Research Design) • Qualitative: Data Analysis (Grounded Theory, Thematic Analysis, Discourse Analysis, Narrative Inquiry) • Self in the Research (Researcher as Participant) • Planning Research (Research Group Formation) • Planning Research • Research Ethics Please note that these topics are subject to change dependent on staff availability, unexpected circumstances, and the assessed needs of the students.
Assessment Strategy
Assessment criteria for this module are as follows:
Excellent (A*, A+, A, A-) • Excellent use of research with appropriate application of methods and statistics • Comprehensive knowledge of Research Methods and Statistics • Detailed understanding with no factual errors • Critical analysis showing evaluation and synthesis of ideas • Novel and innovative originality in approach, interpretation, and voice • Extensive and comprehensive independent research • Logically defended arguments with evidence for all claims • Highly focused and well structured • Excellent presentation with accurate and appropriate expression • Correct format in appropriate referencing style
Good (B+, B, B-) • Good use of research with appropriate application of methods and statistics • Strong knowledge of research methods and statistics • Clear understanding and mostly free of factual errors • Some analysis showing critical evaluation and links between ideas • Novel originality in approach, interpretation, and voice • Considerable independent research from appropriate sources • Coherent arguments with evidence for most claims • Focused and well structured • Clear presentation with accurate and appropriate expression • Mostly correct format in appropriate referencing style
Threshold (C+, C, C-) • Limited use of research with appropriate application of methods and statistics • Some knowledge of research methods and statistics • Understanding of the main concepts with no major factual errors • Basic analysis showing obvious points of evaluation and links between ideas • Some originality in approach, interpretation, and/or voice for part of the work • Some independent research from appropriate sources • Arguments presented with evidence for the most important claims • Readable structure showing focus at times • Acceptable presentation with appropriate expression • Attempt at correct format in appropriate referencing style with no major errors
If you do not meet the threshold then your work will be graded as a Fail. Fail grades vary from Poor (D+, D, D-, E+, E, E-) to Very Poor (F).
Learning Outcomes
- Analyse quantitative and qualitative research data
- Critically appraise research risks within the bounds of appropriate ethical guidelines.
- Critically understand and apply different approaches to research study
- Generate an original research proposal with a critical understanding of how data can be gathered and analysed
Assessment type
Summative
Weighting
20%
Assessment type
Summative
Weighting
80%